!-!Shake!-!
#0
Har lige læst dette:
We got some interesting results. First, we should mention that in the graph above you can see two different kinds of performance drops while transferring files: performance drop due to insufficient system memory, and performance drop due to higher load on the CPU. For the file transfer alone, around 40% CPU power is needed for Gigabit Ethernet solutions without a TCP offload engine. This includes all of today's network solutions that are integrated on motherboards: These are fast, but they put the processor to work (yes, a dual- core chip helps).
Hvad fanden?
Shake
We got some interesting results. First, we should mention that in the graph above you can see two different kinds of performance drops while transferring files: performance drop due to insufficient system memory, and performance drop due to higher load on the CPU. For the file transfer alone, around 40% CPU power is needed for Gigabit Ethernet solutions without a TCP offload engine. This includes all of today's network solutions that are integrated on motherboards: These are fast, but they put the processor to work (yes, a dual- core chip helps).
Hvad fanden?
Shake
#1
Det er ganske rigtigt, Dog svinger det meget mellem de forskellige producenter og interfaces.
#2
du kan blot købe et giganetkort der afvikles i hardware istedet for software så burde du have reddet din røv, men det koster knaster.
#3
Et Intel NIC i en PCI-X port, Uhh :)
#4
Hvad koster et giganetkort?
#5
4# Du vil aligevel ikke mærke forskel
#6
spild af penge hvis altså det ikke er til en server
#8
i den tid du overfører med over 300mbit/sec har du ikke brug for din cpu alligevel, så det betyder nul og nix at den arbejder med diske/netkort.