PhenomII-Q9550-i7 CrossfireX batlle
Bundkort / CPU d. 02. februar. 2009, skrevet af MadsH
Vist: 369 gange.
MadsH
#0
Ja Anandtech har en lille test kørende hvor der bliver testet i games. meget interessant 🙂
Quote:
Originally Posted by anand
During testing, the Intel systems would generate minimum frame rates at this resolutions about 23~24fps on a couple of runs and then jump to their current results on the others. We noticed this in game play also; the Intel systems would hitch and pause at times. We would shutdown the game, clear the prefetch folder, and reboot. The game would operate fine in the next series of testing although we still had stuttering in intensive ground scenes at times. We tried new images, different CPUs, memory changes, and the Sapphire HD 4870 cards with the same results. The Phenom II 940 had extremely stable frame rates in each test and action was very fluid during game play.
Quote:
Originally Posted by anand
After playing through the several levels on each platform, we thought the Phenom II 940 offered a better overall gaming experience in this title than the Intel Q9550 based on smoother game play. It is difficult to quantify without a video capture, but player movement and weapon control just seemed to be more precise. Of course, if you have the funds, we would recommend the i7 platform for best possible performance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by anand
The Phenom II is slightly ahead of the Q9550 when overclocked although it is at a 7% clock speed disadvantage. We have noticed the CryEngine 2 will respond to improved memory bandwidth and latencies as we clock up the processors. The i7 holds a 14% advantage in average frame rates while the Phenom II once again impresses us with the best minimum frame rates when overclocked. However, not having a 20fps minimum frame rate is a disappointment with our multi-GPU setups. The NVIDIA 260/285 solutions scale better in SLI than the ATI HD 4870 products. We hope that ATI can improve their drivers for this game.
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/sh...
🙂
Quote:
Originally Posted by anand
During testing, the Intel systems would generate minimum frame rates at this resolutions about 23~24fps on a couple of runs and then jump to their current results on the others. We noticed this in game play also; the Intel systems would hitch and pause at times. We would shutdown the game, clear the prefetch folder, and reboot. The game would operate fine in the next series of testing although we still had stuttering in intensive ground scenes at times. We tried new images, different CPUs, memory changes, and the Sapphire HD 4870 cards with the same results. The Phenom II 940 had extremely stable frame rates in each test and action was very fluid during game play.
Quote:
Originally Posted by anand
After playing through the several levels on each platform, we thought the Phenom II 940 offered a better overall gaming experience in this title than the Intel Q9550 based on smoother game play. It is difficult to quantify without a video capture, but player movement and weapon control just seemed to be more precise. Of course, if you have the funds, we would recommend the i7 platform for best possible performance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by anand
The Phenom II is slightly ahead of the Q9550 when overclocked although it is at a 7% clock speed disadvantage. We have noticed the CryEngine 2 will respond to improved memory bandwidth and latencies as we clock up the processors. The i7 holds a 14% advantage in average frame rates while the Phenom II once again impresses us with the best minimum frame rates when overclocked. However, not having a 20fps minimum frame rate is a disappointment with our multi-GPU setups. The NVIDIA 260/285 solutions scale better in SLI than the ATI HD 4870 products. We hope that ATI can improve their drivers for this game.
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/sh...
🙂
#1
Den viser fint at amd er helt med i spilydelsen ( Høje minimum fps). Og at i7 er en klasse for sig. 😲
Okey det ser meget lovne ud ser frem til at shg sender min Phenom 940 løbe af ugen 🙂
Så må jeg se hvordan det kommer til at køre sammen med mit 4870x2 :yes:
Så må jeg se hvordan det kommer til at køre sammen med mit 4870x2 :yes:
#3
Ja et eller andet tyder ihvertfald på at ren amd (cpu,chipset og gfx) slet ikke er en dårlig cocktail til prisen. 🙂
#4
Pyha, godt jeg købte i7 😛 :yes: 😀
#5
#4 - Du kan da vidst stadig ikke helt rive høje fps hjem, så håber da ikke det var pga det du kæbte 😉
Jeg skal godt nok have mig en AMD meget snart.. Farvel til Intel, og goddag til favoritten gennem 9 år :yes:
Jeg skal godt nok have mig en AMD meget snart.. Farvel til Intel, og goddag til favoritten gennem 9 år :yes:
#6
#5
Ahva håber du ikke?
Selvfølgelig var det for og få høje FPS i spil nu og i fremtiden, at jeg købte en i7 🤡
Hvad skulle jeg ellers bruge den til, wordpad? 🤣
Ahva håber du ikke?
Selvfølgelig var det for og få høje FPS i spil nu og i fremtiden, at jeg købte en i7 🤡
Hvad skulle jeg ellers bruge den til, wordpad? 🤣