Bims
#0
Er der nogen der ved hvornår det næste Nvidia Geforce kort kommer, og hvor meget det ville yde i forhold til de nuværende? 🙂
#2
hehe ja.. GT300 skulle endelig være en helt ny chip fra nvidia. Den gamle har godt nok også levet et langt liv i forskellige former og udgaver.
#3
Kan vi så få (jeg ber på mine grædende knæ) og en SIMPEL og LOGISK navne række denne gang ?! 😛 😴
#4
-> #3
Tror du selv på, at nVildledende nVidia vil give deres grafikkort en logisk navngivning, når div. chips begynder at samle støv hos producenterne? 😛
Tror du selv på, at nVildledende nVidia vil give deres grafikkort en logisk navngivning, når div. chips begynder at samle støv hos producenterne? 😛
#5
#4 Jeg tror at en dag, så finder de nogle gamle kort frem, som 5200 og måske 6600, og så smidder de nye klistremærker på og sælger dem ! 😀
Men ikke desto mindre må det jo give AMD/ATI nogle gode bonuspoint pt. da de har fattet hele grafikkort konceptet bare en anelse mere. 😛
Men ikke desto mindre må det jo give AMD/ATI nogle gode bonuspoint pt. da de har fattet hele grafikkort konceptet bare en anelse mere. 😛
#6
Ahh, ok først i 4Q, så hvis man ville have noget mere performens nu, ville det nok være en god ide at købe et GTX 280 nu.
#7
#6 GTX280 brugt, GTX275 eller GTX285 som nyt 😳
#8
Ja køb et GTX270 det yder ret godt... ellers to GTX260 core 216 hvis du kan køre sli 😉
#9
Jeg har ét GTX 280 i forvejen, men har stort set en aftale i hus om et til GTX 280, brugt. 😉
#10
problemet er faktisk at nvidia har fattet pointen. Hvorfor bruge penge på at udvikling, når det produkt man har er godt nok, og konkurrencedygtigt. Det er ihvertfald ikke første gang de har gjort det. nVidia har altid arbejdet sådan.
Geforce2 var en lettere forbedre GeforceGTS. Geforce4, var et forbedre Geforce3, eller 2MX. Geferce 5800 fortsatte i lettere forbedrede udgaver i form af 5900 og 5950. Geforce7800 er i gang bare en lettere forbedre 6800 osv osv. og så kender i resten af historien.
Ganske smart tænkt, men må indrømme at geforce8800-arkitekturen har holdt rigtig længe. Men det er måske kun takket være at AMD/ATi ikke har leveret noget tungt skyts de sidste par år.
Geforce2 var en lettere forbedre GeforceGTS. Geforce4, var et forbedre Geforce3, eller 2MX. Geferce 5800 fortsatte i lettere forbedrede udgaver i form af 5900 og 5950. Geforce7800 er i gang bare en lettere forbedre 6800 osv osv. og så kender i resten af historien.
Ganske smart tænkt, men må indrømme at geforce8800-arkitekturen har holdt rigtig længe. Men det er måske kun takket være at AMD/ATi ikke har leveret noget tungt skyts de sidste par år.
#11
It looks like nVidia is dead set on calming the PR storm the competitors are releasing, and the mood in the company is more relaxed. nVidia is certain they have a winner on their hands, but only time will tell whether they managed to pull it through or not.
We already gave you details on the architectural side. GT300 or G300 or NV70 is consisted out of 512 cores [or Shader Processors, whatever you like], features a 512-bit memory controller connecting to GDDR5 memory and well, it is a beast. nVidia packed everything in around 2.4 billion transistors using TSMC's 40nm high-performance process [yes, the one with currently sucky yields]. Given that the original GT200 packed 240 shaders in 1.4 billion trannies, one could argue that nVidia did some heavy dieting on its own architecture and managed to get a body builder shader power in a size zero body. GT300 packs 512 MIMD-capable cores and yet it uses "just" one billion transistors extra. I'll be first to admit that I wondered how GT300 packs at least three billion transistors, but according to our highly confidential source, the 2.4 billion transistors are packed in just 495mm2.
Yes, you've read that correctly. 2.4 billion in less than 500mm2 will put sweat on both ATI and Intel's forehead, since this chip could be profitably manufactured and yet pack performance to potentially blew the competition out of the water. Each of original 65nm GT200 chips took 576mm2 of wafer space, while 55nm refresh GT206/GT200b eats up 490mm2.
In comparison, Intel's high-end Larrabee part is manufactured in 45nm and takes around 600mm2.
Now, if you are wondering why nVidia created a single-PCB GTX295, think again. This part is more than an engineering exercise - but let us put it in this perspective - if nVidia managed to put 2.4 billion transistors in less than 500mm2, with an interesting performance delta between GT200-GT300 in clock-per-clock comparison. we could say that Jen-Hsun definitely opened a can of whoop-ass on its competitors.
http://www.brightsideofnews.co...
LÆS OGSÅ DETTE:
(bæmærk hwt. har fjernet '!.aspx' fra linket, tilføj det selv.
http://www.brightsideofnews.co... !.aspx
We already gave you details on the architectural side. GT300 or G300 or NV70 is consisted out of 512 cores [or Shader Processors, whatever you like], features a 512-bit memory controller connecting to GDDR5 memory and well, it is a beast. nVidia packed everything in around 2.4 billion transistors using TSMC's 40nm high-performance process [yes, the one with currently sucky yields]. Given that the original GT200 packed 240 shaders in 1.4 billion trannies, one could argue that nVidia did some heavy dieting on its own architecture and managed to get a body builder shader power in a size zero body. GT300 packs 512 MIMD-capable cores and yet it uses "just" one billion transistors extra. I'll be first to admit that I wondered how GT300 packs at least three billion transistors, but according to our highly confidential source, the 2.4 billion transistors are packed in just 495mm2.
Yes, you've read that correctly. 2.4 billion in less than 500mm2 will put sweat on both ATI and Intel's forehead, since this chip could be profitably manufactured and yet pack performance to potentially blew the competition out of the water. Each of original 65nm GT200 chips took 576mm2 of wafer space, while 55nm refresh GT206/GT200b eats up 490mm2.
In comparison, Intel's high-end Larrabee part is manufactured in 45nm and takes around 600mm2.
Now, if you are wondering why nVidia created a single-PCB GTX295, think again. This part is more than an engineering exercise - but let us put it in this perspective - if nVidia managed to put 2.4 billion transistors in less than 500mm2, with an interesting performance delta between GT200-GT300 in clock-per-clock comparison. we could say that Jen-Hsun definitely opened a can of whoop-ass on its competitors.
http://www.brightsideofnews.co...
LÆS OGSÅ DETTE:
(bæmærk hwt. har fjernet '!.aspx' fra linket, tilføj det selv.
http://www.brightsideofnews.co... !.aspx