Så mit egentlige spørgsmål er skal jeg købe 3570k eller 2600k? og kan min Corsair H60 Køle 3570K?
--
Du kan overclocke en 2600k mere end du kan med 3570k og har hyperthreading. 3570k er mere strømsparende og har bedre grafik indbygget og er nyere teknologi.
Din corsair h60 bør kunne køle begge dele :D
De vil yde tæt på hinanden for det meste, 2600k vil hoppe foran i tilfælde hvor hyperthreading betyder noget...
med mindre du laver billedredigering eller video, eller grafik osv, havde jeg taget en 3570k...
Svaret blev redigeret 1 gang, sidst af Swayde d. 01-05-2012 20:49:33.
Jeg har købt nyt bundkort og nye ram.
Iht bundkort så er det gen3 pcie, men virker det kun hvis det er med den nye ib eller er det også med sb.
bundkort er et gigabyte z77 ud3h.
3570K da jeg aldrig vil anbefale nogen at købe en cpu hvor afløseren er kommet.
Ny teknologi = pr. automatik bedre ? ... næh.
Her har du lidt læsning
Her er konklusion fra Bit-Tech:
Conclusion
Despite the higher-than-expected cost and higher operating temperatures, the Core i5-3570K is a worthy successor to the Core i5-2500K. It's noticeably faster, more power efficient, has a more powerful IGP and combined with a Z77 chipset motherboard, will offer far more features too.
Fra XBitLab
No doubt, the new Ivy Bridge is an evolutionary step forward. Although no one promised any significant performance differences from the predecessors, Intel engineers managed to ensure a pretty significant, almost 10% performance gain compared with the previous-generation CPUs. Of course, it is achieved not only with microarchitectural improvements, but also with higher clock frequencies. But it is not a big deal, since the new third-generation Core processors aren't any pricier than the Sandy Bridge products, which the new processors came to replace.
Anandtech:
Based on these early numbers, Ivy Bridge is pretty much right where we expected it on the CPU side. You're looking at a 5 - 15% increase in CPU performance over Sandy Bridge at a similar price point. I have to say that I'm pretty impressed by the gains we've seen here today. It's quite difficult to get tangible IPC improvements from a modern architecture these days, particularly on such a strict nearly-annual basis. For a tick in Intel's cadence, Ivy Bridge is quite good. It feels a lot like Penryn did after Conroe, but better.
Edit:
Nyt er ikke altid bedre end gammelt, men i hardwareverdenen er det mig bekendt ikke sket at en ny cpu eller grafikkort har leveret dårligere ydelse end forgængeren. Men ret mig endelig hvis jeg tager fejl.
Svaret blev redigeret 1 gang, sidst af kasperg d. 02-05-2012 09:40:48.
#8
Her har du lidt læsning
Her er konklusion fra Bit-Tech:
Conclusion
Despite the higher-than-expected cost and higher operating temperatures, the Core i5-3570K is a worthy successor to the Core i5-2500K. It's noticeably faster, more power efficient, has a more powerful IGP and combined with a Z77 chipset motherboard, will offer far more features too.
Fra XBitLab
No doubt, the new Ivy Bridge is an evolutionary step forward. Although no one promised any significant performance differences from the predecessors, Intel engineers managed to ensure a pretty significant, almost 10% performance gain compared with the previous-generation CPUs. Of course, it is achieved not only with microarchitectural improvements, but also with higher clock frequencies. But it is not a big deal, since the new third-generation Core processors aren't any pricier than the Sandy Bridge products, which the new processors came to replace.
Anandtech:
Based on these early numbers, Ivy Bridge is pretty much right where we expected it on the CPU side. You're looking at a 5 - 15% increase in CPU performance over Sandy Bridge at a similar price point. I have to say that I'm pretty impressed by the gains we've seen here today. It's quite difficult to get tangible IPC improvements from a modern architecture these days, particularly on such a strict nearly-annual basis. For a tick in Intel's cadence, Ivy Bridge is quite good. It feels a lot like Penryn did after Conroe, but better.
Edit:
Nyt er ikke altid bedre end gammelt, men i hardwareverdenen er det mig bekendt ikke sket at en ny cpu eller grafikkort har leveret dårligere ydelse end forgængeren. Men ret mig endelig hvis jeg tager fejl.
Jeg er skam klar over hvad CPU'en kan.
Ydelse er ikke alting. Hvis prisen på produktet ikke svarer til ydelsen og de yderligere features man får, er det jo ikke særlig fedt.
http://www.edbpriser.dk/proces...
http://www.edbpriser.dk/proces...
3570K yder bedre end 2550K, koster stort set det samme og 3570K har flere features. Så hvad er din pointe i #11 mht. SB vs IB?
3570K - 1.740 vs 2550K - 1.639
http://www.edbpriser.dk/proces...
http://www.edbpriser.dk/proces...
3570K yder bedre end 2550K, koster stort set det samme og 3570K har flere features. Så hvad er din pointe i #11 mht. SB vs IB?
Hm. Jeg troede faktisk at 3570K lå på 2000,- eller deromkring - my bad. Jeg kan godt se, at det for mange vil betale sig at erhverve sig en 3570K end en 2600K.
Har netop fået min 3570k i luften og her er et link til et billede af min desktop med coretemp kørende for at vise temp ved næsten 1 ghz overclock.Jeg har en Antec H2O 920.
IB S-H-I-T