Test: Kingston HyperX Savage EXO USB - extern SSD

Konklusion

Stærkt produkt i en interessant/hip form der mest af alt minder om en forvokset USB-Stick, enheden er yderst bestandig hvad temperatur og holdbarhed angår - ydelsen er god, men under hvad man kan forvente af et produkt i denne prisklasse, og det gør kun ondt værre, at det koster 5% mere end den markant hurtigere enhed fra ADATA.
 

Innovation/Technology - 4
USB-C 3.1 Gen2 udløser 4 ud af 5 stjerner.

Bundle/Accessories - 3
Produktet leveres med 2 USB kabler, én USB-A og en USB-C samt et klistermærke.

Design/Layout - 3
Enheden er ret stor og klodset, den er dog ret cool med interessante former.

Performance - 3
Læse ydelsen er til 5 stjerner, skrive ydelsen til 3 stjerner - hverdags tiden er nede på 2 stjerner - hvorfor vi ender på 3.

Price - 3
Desværre er prisen 744 kr., hvilket er i den høje ende - du får 480GB mod 500GB hos konkurrenten, som iøvrigt er markant hurtigere og kun koster 711 kr. - altså 4% mindre kapacitet for 5% højere pris.

Test: Kingston HyperX Savage EXO USB - extern SSD

Innovation / Teknologi	4
Bundle - Tilbehør	3
Design - Layout	3
Ydelse	3
Pris	3
Samlet	64%

UK summary

Strong product with a hip/interesting shape that somehow reminds me of an upscaled USB-Stick. From the specifications, the device is very reliable. The performance is really good as for read, but write is not satisfying for the class and bad only turns into worse by the fact that its more expensive than competing products.
 

Innovation/Technology - 4
USB-C 3.1 Gen2 is very capable, for this reason we grant it 4 out of 5 score 

Bundle/Accessories - 3
The external SSD is bundled with 2 USB cables, one being USB-A, the other USB-C - along those cables are a couple of flyers and a HyperX sticker

Design/Layout - 3
The device is quite big and slightly clumsy - yet, it is somehow cool with the sharp curves.

Performance - 3
The read performance ranks 5, the write 3 - yet the real life application is down to 2 as for filetransfer - this brings the score to 3 out of 5.

Price - 3
With 4% lower capacity and 5% higher pricetag than the faster competitor, we find the product too expensive considering the value.