Test: Phenom II X3 720 2,8Ghz "Black Edition" UK

Bundkort, AMD d.  09. februar. 2009, skrevet af The Boss 1 Kommentarer.  Vist: 33283 gange.

Korrekturlæser: 
Billed behandling: 
Oversættelse: 

Pristjek på http://www.pricerunner.dk 
Produkt udlånt af: AMD
DK distributør: Techdata

Clock-by-clock test

 

We thought it would be very interesting to compare with different CPU's from both Intel and AMD, which we'll make even more interesting by comparing them clock-by-clock. That's why all CPU's are running at 3.0 GHz in the clock-by-clock comparison. At the same time, we've chosen to test the Core i7-system with both dual channel and triple channel memory, in order for us to see which applications the third channel benefits - please take notice of the extra 2 GB memory available when running triple channel, which might also have impact on the results. The respective systems have been built as similar as possible, and look like this:

 

Camp

AMD

Intel

Intel

Intel
CPU Phenom II X4 810
Phenom II X3 720 BE
Phenom 9950 BE
Athlon 64 5000+
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 Core i7 920 Core i7 920
CPU-speed 3.0 GHz 3.0 GHz 3.0 GHz 3.0 GHz
Mainboard Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H Gigabyte P45T-EXTREME Asus P6T Deluxe Asus P6T Deluxe
Bus-speed 250 MHz 333 MHz 166 MHz 166 MHz
HT Link 2500 MHz N/A N/A N/A
QPI Link N/A N/A 3000 MHz 3000 MHz
RAM 4 x 1 GB DDR2 2 x 2 GB DDR3 2 x 2 GB DDR3 3 x 2 GB DDR3
RAM-channels Dual channel Dual channel Dual channel Tripple channel
RAM-speed 1000 MHz 1333 MHz 1333 MHz 1333 MHz
RAM-timings 5-5-5-15 8-8-8-24 8-8-8-24 8-8-8-24
Video card  MSI 9800GX2  MSI 9800GX2  MSI 9800GX2  MSI 9800GX2
Harddrive Samsung T166 Samsung T166 Samsung T166 Samsung T166
Power Supply  Enermax Galaxy 1kW  Enermax Galaxy 1kW  Enermax Galaxy 1kW  Enermax Galaxy 1kW

 

3Dmark06


3DMarks / Higher is better


3DMark Vantage 64-bit


3DMarks / Higher is better


Call of Juarez 64-bit


FPS / Higher is better


Cinebench 64-bit


CB-CPU / Higher is better


Crysis 64-bit


FPS / Higher is better


Everest


MB/s / Higher is better


Furmark


FPS / Higher is better


Lightsmark


FPS / Higher is better
 

PassMark


Points / Higher is better


PCMark05


PCMarks / Higher is better


PCMark Vantage 64-bit


PCMarks / Higher is better


Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Processor Arithmetic


GIPS/GFLOPS / Higher is better


Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Processor Arithmetic Performance vs. Speed


MIPS/MHz - MFLOPS/MHz / Higher is better


Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Multi-Core Effeciency

    
GB/s / Higher is better - ns / Lower is better


Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Multi-Core Effeciency Performance vs. speed

    
MB/s/MHz / Higher is better - ns/MHz / Lower is better
 


Sisoft Sandra
64-bit Processor Multi-Media


MPixel/s / Higher is better


Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Processor Multi-Media Performance vs. speed


kPixels/s/MHz / Higher is better


Science Mark


Points / Higher is better


SuperPI


Seconds / Lower is better


Wprime


Seconds / Lower is better

 

There's no doubt that the Core i7 with its 4 cores and Hyperthreading (8 theoretical cores) wipes away the feet of all the other CPU's we've been testing when it comes to SiSoft Sandra that can take advantage of all its potential. It does, however, look different when it comes to gaming, and in the other graphical tests as a whole, where we're seeing that the X3 720 can both perform equal to the Core i7, and in several other tests, it also beats it, especially when it comes down to the minimum framerate. All in all, it looks good for the Phenom II that, clock-by-clock, isn't quite as much of an underdog to the Core i7 as Intel would probably rather make it look.

 

We're testing the AM2-performance against AM3 on the next page.

 

MadsAG
 
Elitebruger
Tilføjet:
09-02-2009 01:48:33
Svar/Indlæg:
5421/53
Hhihhi, Dobbel anmeldelse.