Test: Phenom II X3 720 2,8Ghz "Black Edition" UK
Bundkort, AMD d. 09. februar. 2009, skrevet af The Boss 1 Kommentarer. Vist: 33340 gange.
Billed behandling:
Oversættelse:
Pristjek på http://www.pricerunner.dk
Produkt udlånt af: AMD
DK distributør: Techdata
Test
Our test-machine consists of:
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H / BIOS F3
AMD Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition
MSI 9800GX2
4 x 1 GB DDR2
Enermax Galaxy 1kW
Samsung SpinPoint T166 HD501LJ / 500 GB
Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit
Watercooling (CPU only):
NexXxoS X2 Highflow Plexi
XSPC X2O 400
240mm radiator w. 2 x 120mm 1000 RPM fans.
Programs:
| Application |
Type | Resolution |
Settings |
| 3Dmark06 | 3D Graphics | 1280*1024 | Standard |
| 3DMark Vantage 64-bit | 3D Graphics | 1280*1024 | Performance |
| Call of Juarez 64-bit | 3D Graphics | 1600*1200 | Shadowmap: 2048*2048 Shadows quality: High Anti-aliasing: x2 |
| Cinebench 64-bit | CPU | N/A | N/A |
| Crysis 64-bit | 3D Graphics | 1600*1200 | Quality: Very High Anti-aliasing: x2 |
| Everest | RAM | N/A | |
| Furmark | 3D Graphics | 1600*1200 | Anti-aliasing: x4 |
| Lightsmark | 3D Graphics | 1600*1200 | Full screen |
| PassMark | CPU | N/A | N/A |
| PCMark05 | System | N/A | Standard |
| PCMark Vantage 64-bit | System | N/A | Performance |
| Sisoft Sandra 64-bit | CPU | N/A | N/A |
| Science Mark | CPU | N/A | Standard |
| SuperPI | CPU | N/A | 1 M |
| Wprime | CPU | N/A | N/A |
To begin with, we'll do a normal comparison, and afterwards we have something very special on the program, the clock-by-clock comparisons, where we've gathered almost everything we could get our hands on of CPU's from both Intel and AMD. All these clock-by-clock tests have been done at 3.0 GHz for all CPU's. Later we're going to clock even higher, to find out exactly how much can be squeezed out of the processor. We'll begin with looking at the Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition to see how well it does at stock-speeds versus the following processors:
AMD Phenom 9950 BE
AMD Phenom II X4 810
3Dmark06
3DMarks / Higher is better
3DMark Vantage 64-bit
3DMarks / Higher is better
Call of Juarez 64-bit
FPS / Higher is better
Cinebench 64-bit
CB-CPU / Higher is better
Crysis 64-bit
FPS / Higher is better
Everest
MB/s / Higher is better
Furmark
FPS / Higher is better
Lightsmark
FPS / Higher is better
PassMark
Points / Higher is better
PCMark05
PCMarks / Higher is better
PCMark Vantage 64-bit
PCMarks / Higher is better
Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Processor Arithmetic
GIPS/GFLOPS / Higher is better
Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Processor Arithmetic Performance vs. Speed
MIPS/MHz - MFLOPS/MHz / Higher is better
Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Multi-Core Effeciency
GB/s / Higher is better - ns / Lower is better
Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Multi-Core Effeciency Performance vs. speed
MB/s/MHz / Higher is better - ns/MHz / Lower is better
Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Processor Multi-Media
MPixel/s / Higher is better
Sisoft Sandra 64-bit Processor Multi-Media Performance vs. speed
kPixels/s/MHz / Higher is better
Science Mark
Points / Higher is better
SuperPI
Seconds / Lower is better
Wprime
Seconds / Lower is better
Put against the opponents, it is nice to see the X3 perform just aswell as the topmodel of the previous generation and also its new big brother, the Phenom II X4 810, although it is running at 2.6 GHz, which is 200 MHz slower than the X3. Lightsmark is roughly the only test where the X3 pulls away from the pack, except in Crysis, where it actually accomplishes scoring the best minimum framerate. In the multicore tests (Cinebench - SiSoft Sandra), there's less than 25% from the X4 810 down to the X3 720, and the three cores are all being used to the fullest.
Clock-by-clock comparisons on the next page
